Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party of China

[Wang]

history has shown, the people who suggest "freedom and democracy" often turn out to come with new, worse evilment. ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY TALK IN DESTRUCTIVE TERMS.

see the history of communism itself.

first, they became all equal, then it turned out that some require more attention. remarkable, communism was developed in england (marx was british; see also george orwell's anti-communist propaganda)

today i have read the term "socialism" in a book about china's economy. however, it is not affecting me directly. apart from the fact a lot of the computers are made in china. nearly everthing hightech is made in china.

the argument they (chinese economy) would not be productive, is a false argument. criticising parties should verify/improve their own productivity. true the loans are at low niveau, as far as i can see.

it is rather imperialism/slavery. europa already had the according revolution, and has it turned out to become a good, sane paradise?

just a few thoughts.

You should read more about what has been written by checking the links in the first post to the articles.

[alexriversan]

You should read more about what has been written by checking the links in the first post to the articles.

no, i do not read destructive critics, as i have experienced they can greatly lower my emotional tone. i have read the headlines. history repeats itself.

i have already replied: i expect a programme how to achieve things, of course allowing to contain a critic of the CCP how they fail to achieve it. first the good thing please. then a little bit (20 percent) critic.

the good takes the gun and shoots the bad. now the bad is dead, and there is need for a new bad. the good gets the new bad. repeats endless.

guns are not solving anything.

[Wang]

no, i do not read destructive critics, as i have experienced they can greatly lower my emotional tone. i have read the headlines. history repeats itself.

i have already replied: i expect a programme how to achieve things, of course allowing to contain a critic of the CCP how they fail to achieve it. first the good thing please. then a little bit (20 percent) critic.

the good takes the gun and shoots the bad. now the bad is dead, and there is need for a new bad. the good gets the new bad. repeats endless.

guns are not solving anything.

That is your opinion.

[alexriversan]

That is your opinion.

no. my opinion is to replace "communist party" with the author. this is what the author will provide.

the information is the author dislikes the CCP and it is communicated in negative terms.

then, if the CCP is gone, the author/the authors group will change to honeymoon, flowers and free sugarfree candy?

the result if people read this it will make them angry about everything.
the result if they read real ideas they would get angry themselves about the CCP. but (borrowed from orwell) "real ideas are not for everyone".

in terms of cold-war russia these comments are "agitation". nothing else.

probably this group can make up their comments in MAD-magazine style? then i would read them, showing old functioneers sitting in large offices and doing exactly nothing for years. inclusive cobweb.

pointing out the subject of self-determinism: now they do something. manufacturing of detailed statistics about the cobweb/spiders.

can you get the point? hate agitation is out for decades.

[Wang]

no. my opinion is to replace "communist party" with the author. this is what the author will provide.

the information is the author dislikes the CCP and it is communicated in negative terms.

then, if the CCP is gone, the author/the authors group will change to honeymoon, flowers and free sugarfree candy?

the result if people read this it will make them angry about everything.
the result if they read real ideas they would get angry themselves about the CCP. but (borrowed from orwell) "real ideas are not for everyone".

in terms of cold-war russia these comments are "agitation". nothing else.

probably this group can make up their comments in MAD-magazine style? then i would read them, showing old functioneers sitting in large offices and doing exactly nothing for years. inclusive cobweb.

pointing out the subject of self-determinism: now they do something. manufacturing of detailed statistics about the cobweb/spiders.

can you get the point? hate agitation is out for decades.

I suggest you read this: Australian Forums on the "Nine Commentaries": Some Questions and Answers
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-4-5/27626.html

For any further comments you can give feedback to the author on that site.

[alexriversan]

http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-4-5/27626.html (introductionary question)

Q: Professor Yuan, what is your view regarding the legality of Falun Gong practitioners in China intercepting TV signals and broadcasting information? Did they disrupt people’s lives?

Yuan Hongbing: I have heard about the TV interceptions by Falun Gong practitioners in China. First of all, I think these incidents are legal, and their actions are moral, since they are protecting human rights.