All 12 or the first 4 listed in my link?Originally Posted by Maciamo
Not really. You could equally take it that cows were more likely to have been exposed further back. It is correct that tests can be are less reliable when the cows haven't had time for the disease to progress for long but just exactly how much that is true depends on which tests are being talked about.Originally Posted by Maciamo
It's 'safe' (on a purely statistical basis) because vCJD turned out to be far less easy to get than feared. The long (and unknown) period before it takes effect made it a great scare target but it now seems fairly clearly to have peaked in the country where the problem first surfaced.Originally Posted by Maciamo
http://www.cjd.ed.ac.uk/figures.htm
A country where Mad Cow disease was, and is, much more rampant that it is now in Japan - however poor the tests.
http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/bse/.../overview.html
Oh and this link
http://ije.oupjournals.org/cgi/conte...tract/32/5/784
suggests that the best fit for incubation period is 11 years. With the peak BSE cases in the UK occurring at 1992/1993
http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/bse/...aphs/repts.pdf
this would be consistent with peak vCJD cases in 2003/2004.
Bookmarks