where is the source of this?
From here:

http://www.asianbleph.com/faq.html

Interesting comment. Your description of southern han chinese could be more biased than my comment.
Um… possibly but these are very rough stereotypes, and are largely perflexed both by additional stereotypes by province (or even county) and by real life.

Could you demonstrate your points by giving the examples? Guidelines are that it has be a picture taken from 1800-1950 so that the lineages are much clearer than modern asian, who are more difficult to trace the root.
I don’t think our appearances have changed much since the 1940s. The best examples are my grand parents who have the features close to a typical Southern Chinese I describe but I don’t think it is a good idea to put my family’s picture on the web. I don’t think by just picking famous Chinese people mainly from or close to the Second World War periods on the web indicates the looks of most Southern Chinese, because famous Chinese do not necessarily equate typical Chinese appearances. For example, Mao Zedong I have never met any other southern Chinese that look like him.
The large majority of inland Chinese actually appear mainly "northern", just not as paedomorphic/neotenic as Koreans and Japanese.


Dwellers of northern China are "northern", southern coastal China "southern" and central Chinese intermediate.

My point is more or so that with a thick eye fold, double eyelids can be much easily formed, and does not necessarily mean that all chinese are double eye-lids. But northeastern asian's morphology generally supports the single eyelid theory. Quality of double eyelids on Japanese and chinese are certainly different in these regards, if there is one speaking of on japanese at all.
Right, it just that when I read “SOUTHERN HAN CHINESE: Eyes are generally placed flat to the facial surface with the double eyelids.” It looks like to me you are saying generally Southern Chinese have double eyelids . I don't think a lot of the Chinese have double eye lids.

Lastly, why chinese people likes to state that they are the same people as japanese? Don't they have a pride? In terms of Morphology and genetics, many japanese are remote to han chinese people, and lumping all together is misleading, because some japanese looks caucasoid or polynesian than chinese. If more than 40% of that race is not looking chinese, then the claim of identity in east asia does not hold.
I don’t think Chinese like to state Japanese and Chinese are exactly the same people, but we do consider the fact that all three groups (Chinese Japanese Koreans) of people consist to the same varieties. The nearest being said is that "Japanese and Korean culture evolved from Chinese culture".

If there are any Chinese who claimed that then the reply I would suggest is deep-seated Sino centric mentality as ancient China was the "dominant cultural focus” for the domain for over 2000 years, there is a scrap of sinocentricism among some modern Chinese today.

But for me it is my personal experiences that lead me to believe some of us do look similar. Every time I go to the Japanese restaurant they always greet me in Japanese, after about five to six or so times they remember that I am not one of their own then start to talk to me in English. The Japanese on the streets, the ones in tours I have been in also often have approached me and asked whether I am Japanese? So it is them who led me to make this conclusion it is not me who initiate this.

Ancient HuaXia people of upper Yellow River Basin and Dong-Yi kins of China's Shandong Peninsula were the two descents of Han Chinese afterwards admitted Northern/Northeastern nomadic clans plus a few other Mongoloid ethnicities over a sweep of time evolved to what's modern day Han Chinese, which is more a cultural individuality than a monumental ethnicity because it's a genetically " Heinz 57 ".

According to history, Koreans and Japanese migrated from Asia continent, but these two countries are mostly of northern nomadic stock plus a percentage of the population is of Han Chinese lineage.

At least 50% Japanese population share classic Tungusic-Manchu looks with Koreans of Paekche/PUYO ancestry. There is commixture of Polynesian lineage within her people. Certain amount of Koreans and Japanese do appear kind of Northern and coastal region Han Chinese, some Koreans can delineate their kinfolks to Chinese inheritance to China' Shandong Peninsula.

Only the native Japanese Ainu people appear Australoid or the maybe the mixed of Astroloid and Mongloid, I think and the remainder of Japanese appear closer to Mongoloid.

Its true Japanese are genetically nearer to Koreans than the adulterate modern-day Han Chinese, majority of the Japanese gene pool descended from Korea's antique Southern realms expected to geographical propinquity.
Koreans and Japanese are NE Asians rooted on their Mongoloid origins of north-eastern nomadic on the Asia continent.

Er..., what's the difference? I suppose, there is a greater difference between a French Fleming & a Mediterranean Frenchman than between the Fleming & a Rhinelander.
Both France & Germany have quite a mixed population, anyway.
Yes I agree and I know about the certain amount of mixed population between Germans and French but I won’t say they are exactly the same.

French ethnicity is mainly Celtic and Latin and Teutonic and their minority is with Slavic, North African Sub-Saharan African, Indochinese and Basques

I think Germans are mostly Germanic people where as minority in Germany are Turks, Italian and Greeks.

Facial features common to other known proto-caucasoids (either north american or Australian Aborigine)
Huh? I thought Australian aboriginals are Astroloid and North American Indians are Mongloid.