Wa-pedia Home > Japan Forum & Europe Forum

View Poll Results: Three Gorges Dam, hot or not ?

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • It's a praiseworthy and vital project

    2 66.67%
  • The pros overshadow the cons

    1 33.33%
  • It has its pros, but it is bad overall

    0 0%
  • A terrible idea, I wish they had never made it !

    0 0%
  • Don't know/don't care

    0 0%
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Three Gorges Dam : good or not ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    (what a tasty dog) A ke bono kane kotto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 14, 2007
    Age
    40
    Posts
    77

    Question Three Gorges Dam : good or not ?

    The Three Gorges Dam is one of the greatest engineering project that the world has ever seen. It is 2.3km long , 184m high, and took 12 years to complete. Its 34 generators will produce 22,500 MW of electricity. This is praiseworthy as a source or clean, renewable energy.

    The dam will also help control the flow of the Yangtze, which is known to overflow dramatically at regular intervals causing terrible floods that have killed sometimes hundreds of thousands of people. In periods of droughts, the reservoir will provide water to farms downstream.

    But the dam is not just an engineering marvel, a green economic powerhouse, and a way to save millions of lives over time. Its main criticism is that it will create a giant lake that will need the relocalization of many people and the destruction of some old towns and villages and of some of the biodiversity upstream.

    But is it really that bad ? I can't see what's the problem with asking some people to move house when it can save many lives. The environment issue isn't even one as it will prevent natural catastrophes by controlling the mighty river's flow. It will reduces pollution and green house gases. Overall I think it is a commendable and unavoidable project. Anybody care to disagree ?
    I like llX

  2. #2
    Twirling dragon Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location
    Posts
    2,434
    I am in favour of the dam. It's not just a whim of the current Chinese government to show the world what their engineers can do. The project originated with Sun Yat-sen in 1919, was taken over by the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek, then again by the Communists under Mao and his successors.

    I have seen a documentary that depicted the project in a negative light, emphasising only the fact that a few peasants would be expropriated and ancient villages would end up under water. That's trivial, in my opinion. The dam is so much more than that. I agree with everything written above. If there is one river in the world that needed a dam it is the Yangtze.

    What's so mind-boggling is that the Three Gorges Dam will produce 10% of China's electricity ! Each turbine will have the production capacity of 20 nuclear plants ! And that's all eco-friendly renewable energy.

    Then, the river Han downstream of the dam will be diverted northward towards Beijing to cope with the seasonal drought in summer and the advance of the dessert.

    Economically, high-tonnage ships will be able to travel all the way up to Chongqing in Sichuan, China's most populous city, now nearing 35 million inhabitants.
    Last edited by Maciamo; Mar 25, 2010 at 03:09.

    Visit Japan for free with Wa-pedia
    See what's new on the forum ?
    Eupedia : Europe Guide & Genetics
    Maciamo & Eupedia on Twitter

    "What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 20, 2010
    Posts
    10
    The sedimentation problem should not be overlooked. It's not just sediments but also big rocks that are transported by the river. They could block the dam and damage the turbines. If sediments fill up the dam the cost of dredging will be important.

    If sediment cannot flo freely along the river, the waters will cause erosion in lieu of fertilizing the plains.

    Finally, the ecological issue is serious. There is so much pollution flowing down the Yangtze that the lake created by the dam will quickly become a cesspit devoid of life. How are the Chinese planning to clean up the industrial waste in the new lake ?

  4. #4
    Twirling dragon Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location
    Posts
    2,434
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyabuchaa View Post
    The sedimentation problem should not be overlooked. It's not just sediments but also big rocks that are transported by the river. They could block the dam and damage the turbines. If sediments fill up the dam the cost of dredging will be important.
    If sediment cannot flo freely along the river, the waters will cause erosion in lieu of fertilizing the plains.
    The sediments needed to fertilize the land or prevent erosion will come from the hundreds of tributaries downstream of the dam. Sediments can be evacuated by opening the gates once in a while. Big rocks and so on can be stopped with wire netting, then evacuated too. It's not easy, but the dam will produce 10% of the country's electricity in clean energy. It's worth the effort.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gyabuchaa View Post
    Finally, the ecological issue is serious. There is so much pollution flowing down the Yangtze that the lake created by the dam will quickly become a cesspit devoid of life. How are the Chinese planning to clean up the industrial waste in the new lake ?
    Pollution will be created by factories anyway. It won't cause more environmental damage if it stagnates in the lake than if it is allowed to go all the way to the sea. Its just a matter of where the pollution goes, not a matter of quantity. I don't think it is preferable to let heavy chemicals pollute the China Sea, which feeds hundreds of millions of people in China, Korea and Japan and is already overpolluted. The dam might be an opportunity to install water treatment plants - something you cannot do in the sea.

    It's hypocritical (or just logically mistaken) to say that the Three Gorges Dam will create more pollution when it facts it will replace lots of highly polluting coal and gas power plants for 100% clean and renewable energy. The pollution in the river is an entirely different problem, which should be solved by asking factories not to discharge toxic waste in the river but send them for recycling instead. You can't blame the dam if factories don't do their job.

Similar Threads

  1. China's surge: good or bad?
    By lightbeam in forum Finance, Economy & Science
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 7, 2006, 10:46
  2. Chinese food in China; not as good as expected
    By Maciamo in forum Chinese Culture & History
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: Mar 25, 2006, 00:55

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •