Wa-pedia Home > Japan Forum & Europe Forum
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: UN & simplified Chinese- is it really such a big deal?

  1. #1
    Regular Member 82riceballs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10, 2007
    Location
    Where I Want To
    Posts
    11

    UN & simplified Chinese- is it really such a big deal?

    i'm just wondering what other people think abt UN using simplified Chinese
    Personally, I don't really care, because the UN has been using simplified Chinese (and not traditional) since 1973. I think that it's just the reporters that are making a big deal out of this, saying that the UN is stopping the use of traditional when that happened 30 years ago.

    Also, I'm wondering why the Chinese man in the UN who brought up this non-issue, did so.

  2. #2
    Non-Member
    Join Date
    Sep 17, 2005
    Posts
    153
    As much as I personally don't like simplified Chinese compared to the more traditional Chinese, I think that as long as mainland China, which uses simplified Chinese, is recognized as the chair of "China's" seat at the U.N., the use of simplified Chinese is only natural. I don't see a big deal about this, either.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 25, 2007
    Posts
    1
    i have the difference opinion with you.I think simplified chinese is good.It makes writting easily.

  4. #4
    Regular Member 82riceballs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10, 2007
    Location
    Where I Want To
    Posts
    11
    why did the chinese guy in the UN mention it anyways? i heard he even said something about him saying that using only simplified chinese (when the un is already using it) would save paper and money. true, simplified chinese is a bit more economic and "easier to write" for foreigners, but it makes no difference once if you have learned traditional chinese all your life.

    i also personally dislike simplified because i am "anti-anything Mao Zedong did". i believe he only simplified the original characters to control the scope of knowledge the people's republic would have. but anyways, that is besides the topic.

    a thought - did the chinese guy mention simplified chinese in the UN just to irritate taiwan?

  5. #5
    Tubthumper JimmySeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 5, 2006
    Location
    Japan
    Age
    37
    Posts
    57
    Do you have a link to a news article about this. This is the first I've heard of this incident. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by,
    but it makes no difference once if you have learned traditional chinese all your life.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 15, 2007
    Posts
    17
    i think simplified Chinese is easier, but the traditional ones looks better.

Similar Threads

  1. How different is American-Chinese food from real Chinese food ?
    By GoldCoinLover in forum Chinese Culture & History
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: Oct 9, 2009, 15:36
  2. What's the deal with China ?
    By Duo in forum Chinese News & Hot topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Mar 1, 2005, 12:38
  3. Foreigners receive a raw deal in Japan for petty crimes
    By Maciamo in forum Immigration & Foreigners
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Jun 1, 2004, 03:36

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •