Manchus are Han people? What do you mean by "Han"? Both Manchus and Mongols are minority populations in China, and both of them aren't Han Chinese.
Only Chinese history records that they claimed a very small part of the northwestern corner of Koguryo, but it's not supported by archaeological or genetic evidence from the remains there. But even if the Chinese did claim that land, they were destroyed by the Koguryo forces anyway.
Last edited by newd; Nov 27, 2008 at 12:40. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
That is more than 2000 years ago in the West Han Dynasty. After the end of the East Han Dynasty, Korea was seperated from China and become a protected state of her. So most historian in China do not recognize Korea as part of China.
Korean territory was never claimed by China. Only Chinese historians think that the Han dynasty occupied a small fraction of the northwestern corner of Koguryo, but is not supported by archaeological and genetic evidence. So the claim is false.
I never said Tibet should be occupied by China. In fact it shouldn't.
Last edited by newd; Nov 27, 2008 at 22:36. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
What do you mean by "Although not direct rule, it is nominally under the control of the Chinese Empire"? The term "under the control of the Chinese Empire" seems ambiguous. Wasn't Korea also under the control of the Chinese Empire?
So is Tibet, where the Han people occupy.However, the Manchu, the Northeast provinces of China was not Japanese places afterall. The 2 issues were so differernt.
Japan put Puyi as the emperor of Manchu. China installed their version of Panchen Lama and taken away the one claimed by the Tibetan side. They look similar to me.![]()
No, there is absolutely no connection .
This is more fovored . I think so too~'
another things, Where is Maciamo
...
Bookmarks