Wa-pedia Home > Japan Forum & Europe Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38

Thread: Genetic origin of Chinese people

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    CORRECTION ....
    Only Chinese ABORIGINAL MINORITIES like Zhuang,Miao,Yao,Dai,plus others CAME FROM South East Asia,not Han Chinese who ARE MAINLY OF NE Asian stock same as Japanese and Koreans migrated through Tibet Kunlun mountains over 6000 years ago.
    Han Chinese dialects belong to Sino-Tibetan language family.
    Those SOUTHERN Chinese aboriginal minorities' languages are in the same Tai-Kadai group.
    I don't know about language. But appearance and genetics tells us more in my humble opinion.
    If you consider the Y-haplogroups, it seems plain truth that SE is an ancestral population of han chinese.

    Korean and Japanese in genetics do not cluster with han chinese, that's very strange. The hypothesis of han chinese origin in south east asia is more plausible than your unsupported theory.

  2. #2
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Trust me .... PURE native SE Asians HAVE INDIGENOUS LOOKS,entirely different from Han Chinese and blood-siblings Japanese or Koreans.

    I am a full blood ETHNIC Chinese from former S Vietnam,I can attest to this FACT.

  3. #3
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    Trust me .... PURE native SE Asians HAVE INDIGENOUS LOOKS,entirely different from Han Chinese and blood-siblings Japanese or Koreans.
    I am a full blood ETHNIC Chinese from former S Vietnam,I can attest to this FACT.
    You are talking about the outliers in each population, and does not fit the sound statistical models to construct the phylogeny. If you mean the statistical averages in each subpopulation, you could identify that 80% of han chinese and south east asian are closer in looks than to korean or japanese.

  4. #4
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    You are talking about the outliers in each population, and does not fit the sound statistical models to construct the phylogeny. If you mean the statistical averages in each subpopulation, you could identify that 80% of han chinese and south east asian are closer in looks than to korean or japanese.
    That's ********* !

    A salad bowl of cheap lies.

    No PURE Vietnamese,Thais,Laotians, Burmese, Cambodians, Malaysians, Indonesians look a bit Han Chinese for we LOOK VERY ORIENTALS as are Japanese and Koreans who SHARE SAME HERITAGE in culture,history,plus genetics which is extremely painful for Viets to accept as THE TRUTH.
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 14:44.

  5. #5
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    That's ********* !

    A salad bowl of cheap lies.

    No PURE Vietnamese, Thais,Laotians, Burmese, Cambodians, Malaysians, Indonesians look a bit Han Chinese for we LOOK VERY ORIENTALS as are Japanese and Koreans who SHARE SAME HERITAGE in culture,history,plus genetics which is extremely painful for Viets to accept as THE TRUTH.
    I presume that both japanese and korean have different perspectives. It seems that Han chinese out of South East Asia theory is well accepted by internet community, but it is not me who propagated that "not-far-from-true" hypothesis.

  6. #6
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    I presume that both japanese and korean have different perspectives. It seems that Han chinese out of South East Asia theory is well accepted by internet community, but it is not me who propagated that "not-far-from-true" hypothesis.
    WHAT internet community .... YOU ?

    You mean a few DEDICATED VICIOUS Viet-trolls and SPITEFUL unltra-nationalist S Koreans SPREADING THIS FICTITIOUS THEORY.

    Many EUROPEAN FORUMERS plus pure-blood Japanese here FULLY ACCEPTED Japanese,Koreans,and Han Chinese SHARE SAME HERITAGE .... PERIOD

    I caught you pulled that map from MekongDragon's post from JT forum minutes ago.I bet you're ONE-MAN OPERATION with multiple usernames.

  7. #7
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    I presume that both japanese and korean have different perspectives. It seems that Han chinese out of South East Asia theory is well accepted by internet community, but it is not me who propagated that "not-far-from-true" hypothesis.
    What " hypothesis ",AFRICA for where all humans originated IS THE TRUTH not just far from true.

    Some Japanese scientists in the 1980's BELIEVED Japanese ancestors were from this one " tattoo'ed " tribe in Burma of SE Asia.So what,we Chinese and Koreans ARE CULTURALLY,HISTORICALLY AND GENETICALLY RELATED TO Japanese regardless as for you Viets are of TRUE SE Asian indigenous origin same as blood-siblings Thais,and Laotians plus beloved half-lings Cambodians.

    What internet community .... YOU and a few spiteful S Koreans ?

    Funny,you talked as if you've successfully " duped " ignorant internet junkies with relentless constantly postings of repeated message like " Han Chinese came from SE Asia " all over Asian forums.Trust me,very few people take interest in it.This world has over 6 billion people,those several Asian forums you've been working get total of a few thousand active members with a fraction care to know about Chinese origin.

    Believe me,I know you're a Viet as only Viets HATING Chinese for social rejection as equals.It's EXTREMELY PAINFUL for Viets to witness we Chinese generally EMBRACE CLOSENESS toward Japanese and Koreans,for Viets never want to associate with own blood-siblings Thais,Laotians,Cambodians plus a few southern Chinese aboriginal minorities out of DESPISE OWN HERITAGE.

  8. #8
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    [QUOTE=Grimmo
    Korean and Japanese in genetics do not cluster with han chinese, that's very strange. The hypothesis of han chinese origin in south east asia is more plausible than your unsupported theory.[/QUOTE]
    ************************************************** *******
    There are many Koreans and Japanese DNA experts FULLY ACCEPT Han Chinese shared ALL Y-chromozones among yellow race.

    WHAT is strange .... a socially REJECTED hurtful Viet like yourself making time to AIR FICTITIOUS THEORY not merely accepted by HEALTHY-MINDED people.

    WHAT is Viets ultimate pain,EXCLUDED from the prestige NE Asian club ?

    As a side note,I very much DOUBTED you or any Viet knows " the true definition " of Han Chinese.
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 11:36.

  9. #9
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Oddly though,all your postings here CENTERED ON " origin " of Han Chinese.

    Your mission gets SO FANATIC,you even didn't forget to spread your FICTITIOUS THEORY in thread titled " origin of Japanese people " which is IRRELEVANT to the subject.

    Strangely,you make time to air Chinese origin CRAP here and several other Japanese-oriented forums.What's your point,you need to educate Japanese people who are the Chinese ?
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11.

  10. #10
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    Oddly though,all your postings here CENTERED ON " origin " of Han Chinese.
    You mission gets SO FANATIC,you even didn't forget to spread your FICTITIOUS THEORY in thread titled " origin of Japanese people " which is IRRELEVANT.
    That's because of another chinese poster, who posts in that thread. I believe before commenting on the origin of other races, chinese should settle down their roots. Unless chinese people cannot logically and scientifically refute the hypes' argument, any claims on ancestral relationship to korean and chinese should be deemed unconvincing.

  11. #11
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    That's because of another chinese poster, who posts in that thread. I believe before commenting on the origin of other races, chinese should settle down their roots. Unless chinese people cannot logically and scientifically refute the hypes' argument, any claims on ancestral relationship to korean and chinese should be deemed unconvincing.
    That's BIG LIE ...

    I know Minty from CHF,she vigorously refuted your FICTITIOUS THEORY of Han Chinese is of SE origin in fact we are mainly of North Eastern Asian stock.

    It seems,IT'S YOUR OBSESSION plus a handful psycho-pathe Viets as for majority of internet junkies DON'T GIVE A **** about Chinese people in general.
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 13:02.

  12. #12
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    That's BIG LIE ...
    I know Minty from CHF,she vigorously refuted your FICTITIOUS THEORY of Han Chinese is of SE origin in fact we are manily of North Eastern Asian stock.
    It seems,IT'S YOUR OBSESSION plus a psycho-pathe Viets as for majority of internet junkies DO GIVE A **** about Chinese people in general.
    There seems to be some unhealthy chinese individuals who think fine to come into Japan related web sites, and complaining about chinese issues to somebody who merely quoted some of the useful links found in other japan related web sites.

  13. #13
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    .What's your point,you need to educate Japanese people who are the Chinese ?
    What kind of claim is this? Seriously, you should leave the forum before breaking your countrymen's credibility.

  14. #14
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    You do not seem to be good-termpered. Don't get excited in the internet forum, it's just a virtual reality, okay?

  15. #15
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Oddly enough,you've never posted on a topic other than " origin " of Chinese generic race since you activated the account here 6 months ago.

    Your BEHAVIOR is identical to MC420 @ CHF and hypes/iamchinaman/MekongDragon @ JT,with nearly ALL POSTINGS centered on Chinese origin.Co-incident,I don't think so.

  16. #16
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    That's your problem. Just because my interests may step in your garden, you don't have to name-call other posters.

    As far as i can keep track of basic literature, some of the materials were posted in the yahoo anthoropology group, and you can join if you want, but I won't tell you which "anthoropology group". If you are geneticist, you probably already know this, but if not, it's a useless newsgroup.

  17. #17
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    One European administrator of this forum fully acknowledged Japanese and Koreans SHARED SAME FAMILY ROOTS with Han Chinese historically,culturally and genetically in many posts.

    Majority of internet surfers aren't as ignorant as you think.

  18. #18
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    One European administrator of this forum fully acknowledged Japanese and Koreans SHARED SAME FAMILY ROOTS with Han Chinese historically,culturally and genetically in many posts.
    Majority of internet surfers aren't as ignorant as you think.
    So which "antholopogy" forum did you go? I can probably help them to share our ideas with "your" forum.

    Also, your reply do not make much sense. How will the one person's view reflect the overall majority of internet population? I cannot make any comments, because I don't think I've been to your "forum" (I mentioned "group", didn't I?) yet.

  19. #19
    tsuyaku o tsukete kudasai nurizeko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 19, 2005
    Location
    aberdeen, scotland
    Age
    34
    Posts
    165
    Chinese decended from heavenly dragons.


  20. #20
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 21, 2006
    Posts
    8
    Three major lineages of Asian Y chromosomes: implications for the peopling of east and southeast Asia
    Journal Human Genetics
    Publisher Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
    ISSN 0340-6717 (Print) 1432-1203 (Online)
    Subject Biomedical and Life Sciences and Medicine
    Issue Volume 110, Number 1 / January, 2002
    Category Original Investigation
    DOI 10.1007/s00439-001-0651-9
    Pages 80-88
    Online Date Thursday, February 19, 2004
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/.../fulltext.html
    abstract:
    DNA variation on the non-recombining portion of the Y chromosome was examined in 610 male samples from 14 global populations in north, east, and southeast Asia, and other regions of the world. Eight haplotypes were observed by analyses of seven biallelic polymorphic markers (DYS257108, DYS287, SRY4064, SRY10831, RPS4Y711, M9, and M15) and were unevenly distributed among the populations. Maximum parsimony tree for the eight haplotypes showed that these haplotypes could be classified into four distinct lineages characterized by three key mutations: an insertion of the Y Alu polymorphic (YAP) element at DYS287, a C-to-G transversion at M9, and a C-to-T transition at RPS4Y711. Of the four lineages, three major lineages (defined by the allele of YAP+, M9-G, and RPS4Y-T, respectively) accounted for 98.6% of the Asian populations studied, indicating that these three paternal lineages have contributed to the formation of modern Asian populations. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis revealed three monophyletic Asian clusters, which consisted of north Asian, Japanese, and Han Chinese/southeast Asian populations, respectively. Coalescence analysis in the haplotype tree showed that the estimated ages for three key mutations ranged from 53,000 to 95,000 years, suggesting that the three lineages were separated from one another during early stages of human evolutionary history. The distribution patterns of the Y-haplotypes and mutational ages for the key markers suggest that three major groups with different paternal ancestries separately migrated to prehistoric east and southeast Asia.
    Please also see:
    http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJH...338/42338.html

  21. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 21, 2006
    Posts
    8

    Origin of Chinese

    This study is using outdated methodology. Researchers, all chinese, adopted the study method of Cavalli Sforza and microsatellite, which has been obsolete by recent advancement and findings.

    Vol. 95, Issue 20, 11763-11768, September 29, 1998
    Genetic relationship of populations in China
    J. Y. Chua,b, W. Huangb,c, S. Q. Kuangc, J. M. Wangc, J. J. Xud, Z. T. Chua, Z. Q. Yanga, K. Q. Lina, P. Lie, M. Wuf, Z. C. Gengg, C. C. Tang, R. F. Dud, and L. Jing,h,i
    a Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, People's Republic of China; c Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; d Institute of Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China; e Department of Biology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China; f Institute of Cancer Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China; g Institute of Genetics, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; and h Human Genetics Center, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX 77225

    Contributed by Jiazhen Tan, June 26, 1998


    Fig. 2. Hypothetical ancestral migration routes to the Far East. Refer to Table 1 for names of the numbered populations.

  22. #22
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    I don't think you can have a look, because you need a permission from administrator, and the majority of forumers are based around US, and Australia.

  23. #23
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    I don't think you can have a look, because you need a permission from administrator, and the majority of forumers are based around US, and Australia.
    I didn't think you're in Germany

  24. #24
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    What " anthropology ",as you know nothing of it.

    No Europeans,Japanese,and majority healthy-minded S koreans take interest in the FICTITIOUS THEORY of Han Chinese of blah blah blah origin,it's A NOW GENERIC RACE relates to many nationalities on this earth including Arabs and Europeans plus Jews.

    One recent news article reported Chinese race has 12% CAUCASOID BLOOD.
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 12:06.

  25. #25
    Regular Member Mars Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 28, 2005
    Posts
    63
    If I may interrupt here, please. . .

    With all due respect for both parties in the discussion at the moment, I wish to ask that we spend a little time to at least try to think about the concept that the other party is presenting, making every attempt to look at it from that angle (not meaning agreeing or accepting, necessarily) IN ORDER to keep the emotional element as low as possible.

    I really hope that the discussion can go more smoothly and with greater empathy, yet will admit (of course and honestly) that it is only my concern--not that I am in any position of authority. MM

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What's the origin of the Japanese people ?
    By Maciamo in forum History
    Replies: 329
    Last Post: Jul 6, 2016, 01:20
  2. are chinese people peaceful or aggressive
    By mingo in forum Other China-related discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Aug 11, 2006, 21:21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •