Wa-pedia Home > Japan Forum & Europe Forum
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38

Thread: Genetic origin of Chinese people

  1. #26
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    I don't think you can have a look, because you need a permission from administrator, and the majority of forumers are based around US, and Australia.

  2. #27
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    One European administrator of this forum fully acknowledged Japanese and Koreans SHARED SAME FAMILY ROOTS with Han Chinese historically,culturally and genetically in many posts.
    Majority of internet surfers aren't as ignorant as you think.
    So which "antholopogy" forum did you go? I can probably help them to share our ideas with "your" forum.

    Also, your reply do not make much sense. How will the one person's view reflect the overall majority of internet population? I cannot make any comments, because I don't think I've been to your "forum" (I mentioned "group", didn't I?) yet.

  3. #28
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    What " anthropology ",as you know nothing of it.

    No Europeans,Japanese,and majority healthy-minded S koreans take interest in the FICTITIOUS THEORY of Han Chinese of blah blah blah origin,it's A NOW GENERIC RACE relates to many nationalities on this earth including Arabs and Europeans plus Jews.

    One recent news article reported Chinese race has 12% CAUCASOID BLOOD.
    Last edited by ricecake; Jun 15, 2006 at 12:06.

  4. #29
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    I presume that both japanese and korean have different perspectives. It seems that Han chinese out of South East Asia theory is well accepted by internet community, but it is not me who propagated that "not-far-from-true" hypothesis.
    What " hypothesis ",AFRICA for where all humans originated IS THE TRUTH not just far from true.

    Some Japanese scientists in the 1980's BELIEVED Japanese ancestors were from this one " tattoo'ed " tribe in Burma of SE Asia.So what,we Chinese and Koreans ARE CULTURALLY,HISTORICALLY AND GENETICALLY RELATED TO Japanese regardless as for you Viets are of TRUE SE Asian indigenous origin same as blood-siblings Thais,and Laotians plus beloved half-lings Cambodians.

    What internet community .... YOU and a few spiteful S Koreans ?

    Funny,you talked as if you've successfully " duped " ignorant internet junkies with relentless constantly postings of repeated message like " Han Chinese came from SE Asia " all over Asian forums.Trust me,very few people take interest in it.This world has over 6 billion people,those several Asian forums you've been working get total of a few thousand active members with a fraction care to know about Chinese origin.

    Believe me,I know you're a Viet as only Viets HATING Chinese for social rejection as equals.It's EXTREMELY PAINFUL for Viets to witness we Chinese generally EMBRACE CLOSENESS toward Japanese and Koreans,for Viets never want to associate with own blood-siblings Thais,Laotians,Cambodians plus a few southern Chinese aboriginal minorities out of DESPISE OWN HERITAGE.

  5. #30
    Regular Member Mars Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 28, 2005
    Posts
    63
    If I may interrupt here, please. . .

    With all due respect for both parties in the discussion at the moment, I wish to ask that we spend a little time to at least try to think about the concept that the other party is presenting, making every attempt to look at it from that angle (not meaning agreeing or accepting, necessarily) IN ORDER to keep the emotional element as low as possible.

    I really hope that the discussion can go more smoothly and with greater empathy, yet will admit (of course and honestly) that it is only my concern--not that I am in any position of authority. MM

  6. #31
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Question is .... what does Chinese origin have to do with this thread ?

    Nearly ALL POSTS written by him CENTERED ON " Chinse origin " in the last 6 months since he signed up here.

  7. #32
    Banned ricecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location
    Dublin,California
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmo
    I don't think you can have a look, because you need a permission from administrator, and the majority of forumers are based around US, and Australia.
    I didn't think you're in Germany

  8. #33
    Regular Member Mars Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 28, 2005
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by ricecake
    Question is .... what does Chinese origin have to do with this thread ?
    Nearly ALL POSTS written by him CENTERED ON " Chinse origin " in the last 6 months since he signed up here.
    Hello again ricecake san. I understand your concern. The topic could be mentioned within the framework of the thread's theme, as in your post #17, but I agree with you in that it is not something to be harped on under this OP.

    Somehow, Grimmo san had picked up on your post, which revived this thread after it had been dead for a good long while, and then it just got stuck.

    In order to make it smoother, it may be good to let it go more slowly and with less 'heat'--if you catch what I mean. I do hope you'd agree that there is no reason to get worked up over whatever theories there may be regarding origins.

    Thanks for you listening ear !!

  9. #34
    Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 20, 2005
    Posts
    51
    Mars Man, thank you for your friendly moderation,
    Let me point out one thing, its him who first name-called
    me as the MC420 in the china history forum, in another
    thread regarding the origin of japanese people.
    I guess his only intention seemed to obscure the
    discussion on this forum. One thing I am sympathetic about
    him is about on-going china bashing in another chinese
    related forum. But thats his issue, and he should settle
    out them with rational argument, and as you said, without heats.

  10. #35
    tsuyaku o tsukete kudasai nurizeko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 19, 2005
    Location
    aberdeen, scotland
    Age
    34
    Posts
    165
    Chinese decended from heavenly dragons.


  11. #36
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 21, 2006
    Posts
    8
    Three major lineages of Asian Y chromosomes: implications for the peopling of east and southeast Asia
    Journal Human Genetics
    Publisher Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
    ISSN 0340-6717 (Print) 1432-1203 (Online)
    Subject Biomedical and Life Sciences and Medicine
    Issue Volume 110, Number 1 / January, 2002
    Category Original Investigation
    DOI 10.1007/s00439-001-0651-9
    Pages 80-88
    Online Date Thursday, February 19, 2004
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/.../fulltext.html
    abstract:
    DNA variation on the non-recombining portion of the Y chromosome was examined in 610 male samples from 14 global populations in north, east, and southeast Asia, and other regions of the world. Eight haplotypes were observed by analyses of seven biallelic polymorphic markers (DYS257108, DYS287, SRY4064, SRY10831, RPS4Y711, M9, and M15) and were unevenly distributed among the populations. Maximum parsimony tree for the eight haplotypes showed that these haplotypes could be classified into four distinct lineages characterized by three key mutations: an insertion of the Y Alu polymorphic (YAP) element at DYS287, a C-to-G transversion at M9, and a C-to-T transition at RPS4Y711. Of the four lineages, three major lineages (defined by the allele of YAP+, M9-G, and RPS4Y-T, respectively) accounted for 98.6% of the Asian populations studied, indicating that these three paternal lineages have contributed to the formation of modern Asian populations. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis revealed three monophyletic Asian clusters, which consisted of north Asian, Japanese, and Han Chinese/southeast Asian populations, respectively. Coalescence analysis in the haplotype tree showed that the estimated ages for three key mutations ranged from 53,000 to 95,000 years, suggesting that the three lineages were separated from one another during early stages of human evolutionary history. The distribution patterns of the Y-haplotypes and mutational ages for the key markers suggest that three major groups with different paternal ancestries separately migrated to prehistoric east and southeast Asia.
    Please also see:
    http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJH...338/42338.html

  12. #37
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 21, 2006
    Posts
    8

    Origin of Chinese

    This study is using outdated methodology. Researchers, all chinese, adopted the study method of Cavalli Sforza and microsatellite, which has been obsolete by recent advancement and findings.

    Vol. 95, Issue 20, 11763-11768, September 29, 1998
    Genetic relationship of populations in China
    J. Y. Chua,b, W. Huangb,c, S. Q. Kuangc, J. M. Wangc, J. J. Xud, Z. T. Chua, Z. Q. Yanga, K. Q. Lina, P. Lie, M. Wuf, Z. C. Gengg, C. C. Tang, R. F. Dud, and L. Jing,h,i
    a Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, People's Republic of China; c Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; d Institute of Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China; e Department of Biology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China; f Institute of Cancer Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China; g Institute of Genetics, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; and h Human Genetics Center, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX 77225

    Contributed by Jiazhen Tan, June 26, 1998


    Fig. 2. Hypothetical ancestral migration routes to the Far East. Refer to Table 1 for names of the numbered populations.

  13. #38
    Twirling dragon Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location
    Posts
    2,434
    Here is one interesting paper about regional variations of autosomal DNA among Han Chinese. It shows that the genetic diversity in Guangdong is greater than for all the other Han Chinese provinces combined.

    This other study shows genetic structure of East Asia. Han Chinese are closer to the Koreans and the Japanese than to non-Han Chinese from Yunnan or northern Manchuria.

    Visit Japan for free with Wa-pedia
    See what's new on the forum ?
    Eupedia : Europe Guide & Genetics
    Maciamo & Eupedia on Twitter

    "What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. What's the origin of the Japanese people ?
    By Maciamo in forum History
    Replies: 329
    Last Post: Jul 6, 2016, 01:20
  2. are chinese people peaceful or aggressive
    By mingo in forum Other China-related discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Aug 11, 2006, 21:21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •